🔗 Share this article

I possess some thoughts regarding the comments delivered by the sports network broadcaster a well-known announcer following the Serbian champion's win over the American player in the US Open quarter-finals. Consider – the athlete represents the United States, the commentator is from the US – and sports often lend themselves to nationalism. A little bit of disappointment would have been understandable. Rather, he brought up the continued absence of American men at the majors: not one of them had lifted a title since Andy Roddick in 2003, and he had been the last one standing in the tournament.

We all enjoy a narrative, myself included. But really. Even if the American had beaten the legend for the first time, phenomenal talent the Spanish star was looming in the next round, whom he has yet to beat in an official match. And if he’d someway survived that, it would have been title holder Jannik Sinner, versus him the American had lost 10 of the last 11 sets. The two young stars had also split the last seven major titles (and Alcaraz went on to thrash a fatigued Djokovic in the next round). Fritz stated in post-match interviews following his defeat that he in fact preferred his draw, because it offered the opportunity to beat the top three competitors in the world in succession. He is well justified to aspire to the achievement; an competitor is supposed to have faith in themselves. But going into that Serbian last eight match who else sensibly had the drought of American champions on the brain?

The American star's second serve the only thing between her and consistent victories

Fritz, twenty-eight, is placed number four in the world entering this week’s ATP World Tour Finals and has won his last six encounters over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with increasing ease. Presumably he could claim that position for himself in the coming years. But it’s clear that right now, that’s as far as he can rise: The Italian and Spaniard sit a chasm of performance metrics away. Fritz’s elite serve and powerful power on both front side and reverse side are sufficiently enough to defeat the majority of rivals on the ATP tour. When facing the select few generational talents, though, he is often helpless. The last several seasons has witnessed the interesting emergence of lanky, towering athletes who can nonetheless move around with the alarming speed and fluidity of much shorter men. He is 6ft 5ins and appears that way. His footwork is stiff, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his limbs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the other player was controlling, and playing a soft shot against him is typically a safe bet. That acts as a pretty harsh limitation on his upside.

The American has achieved a several dramatic, improbable improvements throughout his career. At the beginning of the ten-year period, he was hovering around the bottom of the top 30. 24 months after, he was sniffing the elite ten. Last year, he unexpectedly exploded to No 4 – and held the position. But the next leap, mixing it up with and beating legendary figures like the young Spaniard, the Italian, and even a declining Serbian, is the toughest of all. What was Fowler thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a serious threat to beat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate commenting on the ongoing drought of American men winning grand slams when he had exited the US Open in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just excessive and the respect for the difficulty of the task insufficient.

Taylor Fritz made a career-best run to the Wimbledon semi-finals in July.

Fritz’s play in that exact quarter-final should have been sufficient of an indication. Djokovic triumphed in four rounds, a victory that only seemed uncertain for moments towards the conclusion, when the American had saved a few match points and had a chance to hold for 5-5. The duo appeared well-balanced during the rallies, with the American earning numerous chances to break. But Djokovic saved break point after break point, extending the streak to the brink of agony. When he eventually did convert one of the chances at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately played a terrible service game to drop serve once more; the Serbian had drawn him into a skirmish peripheral to the main contest and forced him to expend excessive energy to win it. Down match points in the final game, Fritz’s first serve sailed to heaven. He prolonged the contest two times on his backup delivery, but ultimately double-faulted. It wasn’t a choke, in my opinion, only a consequence of needing to hit too many second serves.

The match was fairly compelling proof that Fritz is not good enough to beat any form of Djokovic, who lost to the Spaniard in the following match and did not particularly appeared like he thought he could win. This is perfectly acceptable – the Serbian is the greatest of all time, and may not be at the peak of his physical powers anymore, but has developed enough experience and tactical know-how to make up for quite a bit of the drop-off. The issue is those who were anticipating the American to prevail, and pressuring him to do so, when he was yet to done anything that indicated he could.

Fritz is an valuable contributor to the circuit regardless. He’s a calm, thoughtful presence in press conferences, more so than virtually everyone on the men's tour aside from Daniil Medvedev, prepared to not just express how he feels or the tactic he felt determined a match, but clarify it. That he ought to shoulder the majority of the responsibility for America failing to produce a men's grand slam winner since Andy Roddick seems unfair. (Since the fellow American is competing alongside him in the standings, maybe they can divide that burden.)

Year-End Championships: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Division

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• The Australian speedster
• The Italian stylist

Bjorn Borg Group

• The Italian champion
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• Ben Shelton (US)
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I’d probably dwell on it indefinitely if I don’t accomplish it,” the American informed a journalist in June of claiming a major. It is hoped he understands that he’s not unsuccessful if he doesn’t fulfill that objective, that overcoming the Spanish and Italian's dominant, formidable empire is in fact highly unlikely for everybody else. {